Skip to content
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
Law Meets Gospel

Law Meets Gospel

Informing faith communities about legal issues

  • Home
  • Resources
  • Podcast
  • About
  • Contact
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

D.C. Dist.: RFRA requires allowing church to hold in-person, outdoor worship

October 23, 2020by Josh S. Tatum in Christian, Free Exercise Clause, religious exemptions, RFRA, Washington, D.C., worship

D.C. Dist.: RFRA requires allowing church to hold  in-person, outdoor worship Wagenmaker Law blog covers a recent decision applying the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act here.

Post navigation

previous Previous post: “When Blessing the Water Is Not Enough”
next Next post: “[Department of Labor] Issues Opinion Letters on FLSA Exempt Status and Ministerial Exception”

LMG Content

  • Ind.: “Premises” Means Entire Parcel for State’s Church Liability Shield
  • Tatum’s Ten Tips for More Efficient Meetings
  • Ten Tips for More Efficient Meetings (LMG Podcast)
  • 1750 Luther’s Legacy on Church and State
  • Josh on Theology Thursdays: Church, State, and COVID-19
  • Doing Business through COVID-19: Can Indiana Nonprofits Hold Membership and Board Meetings Remotely?
  • 1747 Law in Luther’s Day
  • 1746 Building a Culture of Accountability
  • 1745 Authority to marry
  • 1744 Reformation 500!

Follow Law Meets Gospel on Twitter

Tweets by @LawMeetsGospel

Categories

Archives

W. Dist. N.C.: Religious Pro-Life Demonstrators may proceed in challenge to COVID Order on religious, not free-speech grounds

4 years ago by Josh S. Tatum less than 1 min read No comments

W. Dist. N.C.: Religious Pro-Life Demonstrators may proceed in challenge…

Wis. Ct. App.: Church Daycare Cook Cannot Sue Based on Prohibition against Cohabitation

4 years ago by Josh S. Tatum less than 1 min read No comments

Wis. Ct. App.: Church Daycare Cook Cannot Sue Based on…

Ind.: “Premises” Means Entire Parcel for State’s Church Liability Shield

1 year ago by Josh S. Tatum 3 min read No comments

Indiana statute protects worshipping communities from claims based on personal injuries sustained on their properties “used primarily for worship services.” The only duty owed to injured persons is to warn of hidden dangers of which it has actual knowledge and not to intentionally harm the person. So if someone gets hurt in a worship space, the religious organization very likely will have a quick exit from any lawsuit brought as a result. But what if the injury occurs elsewhere on property that also has a church building, like next to the parking lot? Is that still part of property used primarily for worship? The Indiana Supreme Court just unanimously answered “Yes.”

“Churches’ Bill of Rights” from Ind. Att’y Gen. & Lt. Gov.

10 months ago by Josh S. Tatum 1 min read No comments

On May 14, 2025, Indiana’s Attorney General Todd Rokita and…

10th Cir.: No interlocutory appeal on ministerial exception

4 years ago by Josh S. Tatum less than 1 min read No comments

10th Cir.: No interlocutory appeal on ministerial exception. The 2–1…

Law Meets Gospel

Law Meets Gospel is Josh Tatum’s online effort to inform faith communities about legal and related issues. Josh is an Indianapolis lawyer who works with faith communities, nonprofits, businesses, and individuals across the country on a variety of legal issues. Josh is a lawyer. But he’s not your lawyer. Law Meets Gospel is for informational purposes and is not legal advice or a substitute for legal advice. It does not create an attorney–client relationship.
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
Law Meets Gospel © 2026. All Rights Reserved.
Designed by MotoPress.